A response to anger about the SOPA strike

I received the email below on Wednesday when Bibliofaction was on strike for the day. It’s a good, passionate email, so I thought I’d share it, and my thoughts about it, on this blog. I’d have replied sooner, but I’ve been ill for a few days and this is the first time I can bear to face the screen:

“It’s nice that you’re on strike, but you are aiming your protest at your customers and readers, not at the Congresspeople who need to see it. Google is placing a black mark on their website, Wikipedia is also on strike, and many other websites are doing the same thing. Nice that you are punishing your users, rather than actually gaining the attention of anyone who really needs to be made aware of your feelings, like people in Congress.

This is why I am generally against mass protests. They generally are not aimed at the people they need to be aimed at.

So, when the day is over, you can feel like you did something worthwhile by going on strike, your users will have been inconvenienced, and Congress will do what they were going to do anyway.

Wouldn’t it have been more useful to encourage a mass writer-letting campaign, and mass emails, aimed at Congress? But, no, we can’t do this. It might actually be effective.

You ever wonder why protests are generally so ineffective, and the agencies being protested against tend to do what they want regardless? Think about it.”

So, the email is a bit angry, but I can forgive that because it’s written by someone who cares and I’ve written plenty of angry emails in my time.

My short answer… I did the best I could in the time I had. I heard about the planned Wikipedia Blackout on Tuesday night. Looked at the SOPA Strike site and implemented their quick fix code for blacking out a website. I wrote a very quick email to Bibliofaction members. My wife checked the email for any nonsense spelling and then I forgot to press the send button. On Wednesday morning while I ate my porridge and looked at emails on my phone I was surprised no one had replied (Bilbiofaction members are generally pretty vocal and articulate and I thought this would be of interest). I realised I hadn’t press send. I sent the email. Then I was ill for a few days.

My longer, post-rationalised thoughts, considered after-the-fact and mostly prompted by this email…

  • Wikipedia drew a great big line in the sand. I had to choose which side of the line to stand. It would have been negligent not to take part in the strike, even if other methods of protest individually are more effective
  • “Customers” isn’t the right word for Bibliofaction members. We’ve run the website at a loss for over five years because it gives people a chance to express themselves creatively. I don’t care if the first time someone writes a short story it’s Harry Potter fan fiction, or if it uses trademarked copyrighted names, I just want people to have the confidence to write something. Anything. SOPA/PIPA are in direct opposition of that goal.
  • We couldn’t afford the time or the money to fight a claim under SOPA/PIPA if this became law. We can barely afford the hosting. It would be the death of Bibliofaction.
  • People rarely have time to read their emails, so blacking out the site is harsh, but it shows our members what is really at stake better than any email I can write.
  • Bibliofaction’s audience is worldwide, but a big chunk is in the US – if these people write to their members of congress it has more impact than me signing the petition (which I still did)
  • I can only email registered Bibliofaction members who have opted in to email comms. By blacking out the site I could also reach the readers of the website who don’t have registered accounts.
  • On a technicality, the links provided did ask you to write to congress. It would have been more effective if I had asked you to do that directly in the email (see excuse about limited time for that one)

So these thoughts are not the careful considered process I went through to decide what to do. This was not a planned campaigning activity, it was an action taken as a matter of urgency. However, it’s reassuring to reflect on these questions and still agree with the action taken.

Just as I finish writing this article, this message popped up in my email

“Thanks for letting me know. I live in Switzerland and never heard of it !”

Bibliofaction will go dark tomorrow

Bibliofaction will be on strike tomorrow, in support of all the websites standing up against SOPA.

See the web goes on strike for more info.

Why patents are anti-social

Where would the human race be if the first person to do anything was the only person allowed to do that thing.

“Hey guys. Check this out. I’ve just invented the alphabet.

Would you like to use it? Sure.

I only ask for the carcass of one wild boar a week as payment for using my idea.”

If that sounds bad, imagine how much worse it would be if it wasn’t the first person to do something that owned the rights, but it was instead the first person rich enough to employ a patent lawyer that took exclusive ownership of the idea for the next ~20 years.

We now live in a world where companies buy-up other companies, not because the they want to sell their products, employ their staff or service their customers, but simply to own their patents.

Instead of protecting the entrepreneur from the competitive might of large corporations, patents now protect large corporations from the competetive threat of the entrepreneur.

Patents are inherently anti-competitive and favour the rich. If you don’t think they favour the rich, try hiring a patent lawyer or offering a 1-click payment solution on your e-commerce website.

Patents for web technologies can last close to 20-years; that’s longer than any web technology is likely to last. Instead of offering a grace period in which the inventor can establish a place in the market to benefit from their own invention, patents now offer total ownership of the marketplace for its entire lifespan.

So what’s the alternative?

How about…

  • No company or individual is allowed to own more than 5 patents in total
  • Companies with existing patents can keep them, but they cannot acquire new patents until they own less than 5
  • New patents last a maximum of 5 years
  • Patents can be sold, but they cannot be licensed
  • Create some kind of body where patents can be donated for public use, allowing inventors to patent ideas for the public good rather than private gain

Help Stop SOPA/PIPA

Bob Marley & the Whalers

I installed WordPress tonight now that I’ve finished working on my new theme, and found a draft post on one of my old blogs titled “Bob Marley & the Whalers”.

I clearly never got as far as writing the article, but I’d love to know what on earth it was going to be about.

Genius use of animated gifs (yes, you read that right)

Link: Genius use of animated gifs (yes, you read that right)

Some more examples can be found here. I’m especially keen on the less is more approach, this could really add a lot to a website.

Web design in a few years time

Link: Web design in a few years time

The more I learn about CSS3, the less I think that photoshop and the ‘design stage’ of current web design practices will be at all relevant in just a few years time. I think that within a year I’ll have stopped using photoshop on any project I was developing for myself. And for work that other people need to review, new practices will to evolve to cope with that. But it’s enough of a change for me to think that it’s not worth upgrading my own copy of photoshop any more. Design will happen in the browser, and for basic photo adjustments, it’s amazing how much you can achieve with something as simple as picassa.

This change is a challenge to everyone who works in web design and I suspect it will leave a few designers, developers and other webbies in limbo.

P.s. The title (and corresponding link) are not to suggest that CSS3 is not valid right now. Only that working processes will take a little time to catch up with this opportunity.

Tell-all telephone

Link: Tell-all telephone

Fascinating, boring, beautiful and scary all at the same time.

Best landing page fact so far…

Best landing page fact of the week so far… “Amazon’s Kindle page is three Hasselhoffs high.

(A great article too by the way)

Less is more, more or less.

We’ll be making Bibliofaction much more streamlined soon. It should be easier to use and quicker to load. Rather than trying to make the site all things to all people, we will focus on the core ‘thing’ – the short stories.